BanderasNews
Puerto Vallarta Weather Report
Welcome to Puerto Vallarta's liveliest website!
Contact UsSearch
Why Vallarta?Vallarta WeddingsRestaurantsWeatherPhoto GalleriesToday's EventsMaps
 NEWS/HOME
 EDITORIALS
 ENTERTAINMENT
 VALLARTA LIVING
 PV REAL ESTATE
 TRAVEL / OUTDOORS
 HEALTH / BEAUTY
 SALON & SPA SERVICES
 HEALTH FOR WOMEN
 HEALTH FOR MEN
 DENTAL HEALTH
 ON ADDICTION
 RESOURCES
 SPORTS
 DAZED & CONFUSED
 PHOTOGRAPHY
 CLASSIFIEDS
 READERS CORNER
 BANDERAS NEWS TEAM
Sign up NOW!

Free Newsletter!
Puerto Vallarta News NetworkHealth & Beauty | May 2007 

US Senate Guts Drug Bill
email this pageprint this pageemail usBeth Gorham - The Montreal Gazette


A woman stands before a banner featuring a large red ribbon, the internationally-known symbol of AIDS prevention. Former US president Bill Clinton announced a deal with two generic drug companies Tuesday to slash the cost of second line anti-retroviral treatment for HIV/AIDS patients in the developing world. (AFP/Dibyangshu Sarkar)
Prescription imports from Canada. FDA will be required to certify safety.

The U.S. Senate gutted the latest attempt yesterday to legalize prescription drug imports from Canada and other countries.

Despite a lot of support for the plan from both Democrats and Republicans, senators ultimately decided to require that the Food and Drug Administration first certify the imports are safe and effective.

Federal officials have said for years they can't do it. So the requirement, passed on a 49-40 vote, effectively quashed the imports effort.

Even if the bid for expanding the drug trade had made it through without any caveats, the administration said it would have recommended a veto from President George W. Bush.

The plan is also opposed by pharmaceutical companies with profit margins on the line.

And its fate will be a relief for some Canadian industry groups that worried about supply problems north of the border.

But the measure has long had broad popular support among Americans who pay among the highest prescription drug prices in the world because they aren't controlled by government.

Democrats who took control of Congress in last November's midterm elections made the issue a priority, saying Americans had voted for change.

A similar measure to import drugs was introduced in the House of Representatives.

Senator Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, who sponsored the imports, said arguments that imports would open the door to dangerous counterfeits are "nonsense" perpetrated by big drug companies protecting their profits. He acknowledged the safety certification voided his bid to legalize drugs from Canada, Australia, Europe, Japan and New Zealand.

Vermont's Bernie Sanders argued that many Americans "are already supporting this legislation by getting in their cars and going over the Canadian border." Drug companies, he said, are the "greediest, most powerful special interest" in the United States, spending $172 million U.S. on lobbying efforts in 2006.

The AARP, a non-profit group for people over 50 years old, had vigorously campaigned for imports, calling it a "national embarrassment" that people in the world's most advanced medical system can't get affordable medicine at home.



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes • m3 © 2008 BanderasNews ® all rights reserved • carpe aestus