Puerto Vallarta Weather Report
Welcome to Puerto Vallarta's liveliest website!
Contact UsSearch
Why Vallarta?Vallarta WeddingsRestaurantsWeatherPhoto GalleriesToday's EventsMaps
Sign up NOW!

Free Newsletter!

Puerto Vallarta News NetworkNews Around the Republic of Mexico 

Mexico Pushes for More 'Direct' Ties With Canada

go to original
June 19, 2013

Mexico's ambassador to Canada revealed his country's desire for deeper relations between Mexico and Canada Ė not just for dealing with the US, but also as direct trading partners, and diplomatic allies.

New Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto wants ties with Canada to be a priority in the countryís foreign policy, rather than the on-again, off-again interest of two countries distracted by relations with the United States, Mexicoís Canadian ambassador says.

Ambassador Francisco Suarez Davila arrived in Ottawa a week ago with a mandate to pursue a new deepening of relations between Mexico and Canada Ė not just for dealing with the United States, but also as direct trading partners, and potential diplomatic allies on the world stage.

"I think I have arrived at a very opportune time. The political stars are aligned," Mr. Suarez said in an interview. "Thatís the indication I have received from President Pena, to go beyond the rhetoric to really establish that Canada is a priority for Mexicoís foreign policy. Itís a real priority: Canada, itself, apart from the North American regional dynamic."

Ambassador Francisco Suarez Davila

It is a simple but important signal in Canada-Mexico relations: that the two countries should see each other as important for more than just what that means in dealing with the United States. They have been trade partners in the North American Free Trade Agreement since 1993, and from time to time expressed a desire for stronger ties. But the interest has blown hot and cold. Both countriesí perspectives on North America are, of course, are dominated by relations with the United States.

"Itís a fact of life that we have this big elephant in between. Itís there. But we donít at all like the idea of an off and on approach," Mr. Suarez said. "Sort of, you know, oh now Mexico is important, but until that time, no, itís more important for us just to have a relationship with the US."

The "political stars" that Mr. Suarez refers to is that changes in both capitals are coming at the same time as Ottawa tries to re-focus Canadian foreign policy around major emerging markets, and Mr. Pena is signalling new interest in Canada.

Mr. Suarez, an economist who has served as Mexicoís envoy to the International Monetary Fund and to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, noted the two countries are already important to each other in economic terms, as each otherís third-largest trading partners.

He noted that Mexico and Canada joined together to fight protectionist US meat-labelling rules, known by the acronym COOL, by challenging them at the World Trade Organization (WTO,) winning a decision from a trade tribunal.

"We acted together with the WTO. Weíve got the decision. And weíre ready to act, taking possible reprisals if they donít fulfill the WTO. Common vision and common action," Mr. Suarez said.

He said that Mexico and Canada can strike a similar alliance in 12-nation talks for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, to ensure that the talks stay focused on economics and trade, and that it is not used by the US to jockey with China for political influence.

Within North America, Canada and Mexico have common interests in integrating the continentís three economies, by pushing for better-aligned infrastructure Ė notably railways and oil-and-gas pipelines Ė across the continent. That, and cheap energy Ė from the US shale-gas revolution, and extensive oil and gas in both Canada and Mexico, can lead to a revival of North American manufacturing if itís combined with integrated infrastructure and better transportation costs, he argues, leading to "the re-industrialization of these countries."

For many in the United States and Canada, however, the question is whether it is Mexico, with lower labor costs, that will benefit primarily from a revival of North American manufacturing. American auto manufacturers and Canadian companies like Bombardier have built plants in Mexico to take advantage of lower wages.

But Mr. Suarez Davila argues thatís a short-sighted argument. Mexico, with a young population, can offer a labor force to the US and Canada, but also a market with a middle class of 50 million people. And Canadians can benefit when their companies manufacture in Mexico, he argues.

"You developed Bombardier as a very successful enterprise in Canada," he said. "They are building airplane parts in Mexico. Those airplane parts are sent to Canada, and they integrate the Bombardier full units here. But at a cost where the Bombardier planes can compete better with the Brazilian planes, or whatever."