BanderasNews
Puerto Vallarta Weather Report
Welcome to Puerto Vallarta's liveliest website!
Contact UsSearch
Why Vallarta?Vallarta WeddingsRestaurantsWeatherPhoto GalleriesToday's EventsMaps
 NEWS/HOME
 EDITORIALS
 AT ISSUE
 OPINIONS
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 LETTERS
 WRITERS' RESOURCES
 ENTERTAINMENT
 VALLARTA LIVING
 PV REAL ESTATE
 TRAVEL / OUTDOORS
 HEALTH / BEAUTY
 SPORTS
 DAZED & CONFUSED
 PHOTOGRAPHY
 CLASSIFIEDS
 READERS CORNER
 BANDERAS NEWS TEAM
Sign up NOW!

Free Newsletter!
Puerto Vallarta News NetworkEditorials | Issues 

Are Latinos White? US Census Confusion Sparks Debate Over Racial Identity
email this pageprint this pageemail usHéctor Manuel Castro - El Diario de El Paso
go to original
March 10, 2010



Latinos share first-person narratives - a few of the countless stories among the fastest growing population in the U.S. ('Chasing the Dream' by CNN.)
El Paso - Anthropologists and Latino residents of El Paso have called into question recent statements made by a social activist that advise Hispanics to register their race as "white" when it comes time to fill out the census form this month.

Speaking to the El Paso Times this past week, Jessie Acosta, chairman of the El Paso Complete Count Committee, estimated that 98 percent of the Hispanics living in El Paso fall are technically white. His comments have generated much controversy and confusion in the community.

Academics and citizens agree that census officials have committed a "racial inaccuracy" by not offering Hispanics the opportunity to register themselves as "mixed," given that the vast majority of Latinos are of mixed descent, with Spanish and indigenous American ancestors.

Margarita Rendón, a Mexican woman living in El Paso who regards herself as trigueña [a lighter-skinned Latina], stated that there exists enormous confusion over the race sections on these types of questionnaires. She stated that she is neither black nor white, and for this reason she always marks the box labeled "Other" to answer these questions.

"I always thought that the gringos were the white ones," she said, a bit confused.

But Acosta, reaffirming his initial position, pointed out that one should make a distinction between race and ethnicity. The former, he said, has to do with biological ancestry, while the latter pertains to the cultural heritage of a person.

Some anthropologists disagree with this construction, claiming that the notion of race is a purely social paradigm with no biological grounding whatsoever.

"The census is not logical," said David Tavárez, professor of anthropology at Vassar College in New York. "It responds to the political pressures of certain groups in this country."

Tavárez stated that because the concept of race is entirely subjective, and the census form is filled out by each person individually, this self-report methodology makes it impossible to obtain precise, objective data regarding the race and ethnicity of the participants.

Damon Dozier, of the American Anthropological Association, also eschewed biology-based definitions, and pointed toward the role historical constructions play in our understanding of race.

"Looking at race through the lens of biology stigmatizes some human beings and privileges others. There is no evidence that there are biologically different groups of people," Dozier said.

But Acosta claims that the Census Committee has attempted to resolve these misunderstandings by putting the question about ethnicity before the question about race on the census form.

"Question number eight asks whether or not you are Hispanic, which refers to your ethnicity," he said. "Once you answer that one, you move onto the next one, which is the question about race, and the options there are: White, Black, Asian, Native American and Other."

Andrea Hernández, an El Paso accountant, also takes issue with the methodology of the census, arguing that if its aim is to get a tally on the nation's population and racial demographics, then they should be as precise as possible when formulating questions regarding race.

"Why not include an option that says mestizo?" Hernández said, arguing that the presence of the "Other" option creates more confusion and complications.

"They should clearly list all possible alternatives, rather than leaving room for people to regard themselves as 'Other,'" she said. "Because, really, what is 'Other,' after all?"

Acosta explained that much of this confusion is owed to a longstanding historical fallacy that has led people to mistakenly believe that only Anglo-Saxons should be considered white.

Acosta also pointed out that in America this confusion only exists within the Latino community. According to him, African-Americans know that they are considered black, and Asians and Native Americans can easily identify their respective societal classifications. Latinos, however, are stuck in a kind of limbo, not knowing to which race they belong.

"During the 2000 Census, 39 percent of Latinos in El Paso did not know what their race was, and I am sure that something similar will occur this year. This is why the Census wants to classify as 'white' those who marked 'hispanic' for the ethnicity question and then checked 'Other' in the box for the race question," he said.

Translation: Ryan Croken. Ryan Croken is a freelance writer and editor based in Chicago. His essays and book reviews have appeared in The Philadelphia Inquirer, Z Magazine and ReligionDispatches.org. He can be reached at

ryan.croken(at)gmail.com.



•  R E A D E R S '  C O M M E N T S  •


I understand the confusion because as a society our definitions of race in America are messed up, but the census categories themselves seem pretty good to me, because: Latino is seperated as a cultural/linguistic group, not a race, and because you are supposed to CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY. So, a mestizo is Hispanic, and White and American Indian. Check out the definition that says AmerIndian includes of decent from North, South, and Central America. The confusing part I think is that they ask for which tribe you belong to, which of course very few Latinos would know. If they removed that line though I think it would be close to perfect. Mestizo is not a distinct race, but a mix of races, and so should not be a seperate category. America is much more mixed than it feels, and in addition to it being historically accurate, I think it would be beneficial for us all to realized how mixed together we all are.
- Benjamin Griffith
This is the way I see it. Not all African Americans are pure African. Most of them have European ancestry, but they will mark in the Census as being African American. For Latinos, it should be as follows: If you are brown skin, dark hair, round face with somewhat Asian eyes, than you are a descendent of Native Indians. So we can mark ourselves if we want to as Native Americans for living in the Western Hemisphere. If you are very light skin, almost Spaniard like, than I guess you can put down as being White. If you are Afro Latino like Sammy Sosa or Manny Ramirez, than you can put down as being black. If you consider yourself a combination of everything, than you can put that on the census as being mixed. But in reality everyone in America is already racially mixed.
- Carlos Ocon Jr.



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes • m3 © 2009 BanderasNews ® all rights reserved • carpe aestus